Saturday, 7 July 2012

Item 68: Prefer executors and tasks to threads


In release 1.5, java.util.concurrent was added to the Java platform. This package contains an Executor Framework, which is a flexible interface-based task execution facility. Creating a work queue that is better in every way than the one in the first edition of this book requires but a single line of code:

ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();

Here is how to submit a runnable for execution:

executor.execute(runnable);

And here is how to tell the executor to terminate gracefully (if you fail to do this, it is likely that your VM will not exit):

executor.shutdown();

You can do many more things with an executor service. For example, you can wait for a particular task to complete (as in the “background thread SetObserver” in Item 67), you can wait for any or all of a collection of tasks to complete (using the invokeAny or invokeAll methods), you can wait for the executor service’s graceful termination to complete (using the awaitTermination method), you can retrieve the results of tasks one by one as they complete (using an ExecutorCompletionService), and so on.

If you want more than one thread to process requests from the queue, simply call a different static factory that creates a different kind of executor service called a thread pool. You can create a thread pool with a fixed or variable number of threads. The java.util.concurrent.Executors class contains static factories that provide most of the executors you’ll ever need. If, however, you want some thing out of the ordinary, you can use the ThreadPoolExecutor class directly. This class lets you control nearly every aspect of a thread pool’s operation.

Choosing the executor service for a particular application can be tricky. If you’re writing a small program, or a lightly loaded server, using Executors.new- CachedThreadPool is generally a good choice, as it demands no configuration and generally “does the right thing.” But a cached thread pool is not a good choice for a heavily loaded production server! In a cached thread pool, submitted tasks are not queued but immediately handed off to a thread for execution. If no threads are available, a new one is created. If a server is so heavily loaded that all of its CPUs are fully utilized, and more tasks arrive, more threads will be created, which will only make matters worse. Therefore, in a heavily loaded production server, you are much better off using Executors.newFixedThreadPool, which gives you a pool with a fixed number of threads, or using the ThreadPoolExecutor class directly, for maximum control.

The Executor Framework also has a replacement for java.util.Timer, which is ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.

A complete treatment of the Executor Framework is beyond the scope of this book, but the interested reader is directed to Java Concurrency in Practice.


Reference: Effective Java 2nd Edition by Joshua Bloch